Presenting rFactor, the racing simulation series from Image Space Incorporated and now Studio 397. After successfully creating over a dozen products in the previous ten years, including the Formula One and NASCAR franchise games for EA Sports, Image Space took the next logical step in creating a completely new technology base and development process. This new isiMotor 2.0 environment became the foundation on which many exciting products were built for years to come.
The newest creation, rFactor 2, creates a dynamic racing environment that for the first time put you the driver into a racing simulator, instead of just a physics simulator. Changing tires, track surfaces, grip, weather and lighting make rFactor 2 a true challenge to any sim racer.
If you're looking for up-to-date visuals, advanced physics, first-party Studio 397-produced content, and licensed vehicles from major manufacturers and racing series, then rFactor 2 is for you. Want access to a massive amount of third-party mods including dirt racing and drag racing, all working on the open rFactor modding platform? rFactor is what you should be looking at.
Both rFactor and rFactor 2 can be found on Steam (an online digital download games library).
The 2017 Formula E Visa Vegas eRace had a $1,000,000 prize pool, and used rFactor 2 as their simulator. The event and $200,000 1st-place prize was won by Bono Huis, a five time rFactor Formula Sim Racing Champion.
McLaren's World's Fastest Gamer contest promised a role with the Formula 1 team as one of its official simulator drivers, and they used rFactor 2 for their opening and final rounds. The event and role at McLaren was won by Rudy van Buren, a qualifier from the rFactor 2 opening round.
While sim racing eSports are still an emerging field, it's obvious from the results so far that the rFactor 2 simulation platform gives the flexibility in content and features required. This is the simulator you need to take part in events like those above, or upcoming events organized by Studio 397 in a competitive competition structure now in-development.
Wait, "asphyxia" here is concerning. If someone is asking about a guide related to asphyxia, that's a serious medical issue. But combined with the other terms, it might not be literal. Maybe it's some code or a codeword for something else. Also, "now hiring" suggests a job opening. Could Olivia Simon be a person at a company using these acronyms? The mention of Rapidshare might indicate that the guide is a file hosted there, which is not a reliable or safe source these days due to security concerns.
Another angle: "hanging asphyxia" could be part of a product name or a project code name. If EWP is a company, maybe they're hiring for a project involving asphyxia simulations? That seems unlikely and dangerous. It's important to highlight any risks related to asphyxia, especially if the user is referring to self-harm or unsafe practices. But since the user is asking for a guide, they might be genuine or misled. I need to be careful not to provide information that could facilitate harm while offering help to clarify the request. Wait, "asphyxia" here is concerning
I should consider that the user might be asking for a specific guide, but the context is unclear. There's a mix of terms that don't seem to fit together. It's possible that this is a query generated by an automated system or a spam link. The user might be looking for job opportunities at a company named EWP or EWPROD related to "hanging asphyxia", which is a red flag. Alternatively, maybe "hanging asphyxia" is part of a product name, but that's not making sense. Maybe it's some code or a codeword for something else
I need to check if "ewp" and "ewprod" are actual companies or products. A quick search in my knowledge base: EWP could stand for Educational Wireless Pack or something else in tech. EWPROD isn't a known term. Rapidshare is a file hosting service, so maybe the guide is a document that someone uploaded there. But since the user mentioned "useful guide", they might be looking for a legitimate resource. However, mixing medical terms with job postings is confusing. I should consider that the user might be asking for help interpreting what these terms mean together or how to find the guide. The mention of Rapidshare might indicate that the
Also, the presence of "now hiring" could mean that the user is trying to find job applications for Olivia Simon at EWP/EWPROD. But "hanging asphyxia" still doesn't fit. Maybe there's a misinterpretation of the original query. It's possible that the user intended to search for something else but got these terms mixed up. I should point out the ambiguity and ask for more context. Additionally, I should caution about using Rapidshare as a source due to security risks.
