Theorem 5 (Nonholonomic constraints) For nonholonomic constraints linear in velocities (distribution D ⊂ TQ), the Lagrange–d'Alembert principle yields constrained equations; these do not in general derive from a variational principle on reduced space. Well-posedness is proved under standard regularity and complementarity conditions (Section 6).
Theorem 1 (Newton–Euler Equations, body frame) Let a rigid body of mass m and inertia I (in body frame) move in space under external force F_ext and moment M_ext expressed in body coordinates. The equations of motion in body frame are: m (v̇ + ω × v) = F_body I ω̇ + ω × I ω = M_body where v is body-frame linear velocity of the center of mass, ω is body angular velocity. (Proof: Section 3.) rigid dynamics krishna series pdf
Theorem 4 (Reduction by symmetry — Euler–Poincaré) If L is invariant under a Lie group G action, then dynamics reduce to the Lie algebra via the Euler–Poincaré equations. For rigid body with G = SO(3), reduced equations are Euler's equations. (Proof: Section 7.) The equations of motion in body frame are:
Theorem 3 (Hamiltonian formulation and symplectic structure) T Q is a symplectic manifold with canonical 2-form ω_can. For Hamiltonian H: T Q → R, integral curves of the Hamiltonian vector field X_H satisfy Hamilton's equations; flow preserves ω_can and H. For rigid bodies on SO(3), passing to body angular momentum π = I ω yields Lie–Poisson equations: π̇ = π × I^{-1} π + external torques (Section 4–5). (Proof: Section 7
Authors: R. Krishna and S. P. Rao Publication type: Research monograph / journal-length survey (constructed here as a rigorous, self-contained presentation) Date: March 23, 2026
Theorem 2 (Euler–Lagrange on manifolds) Let Q be a smooth configuration manifold and L: TQ → R a C^2 Lagrangian. A C^2 curve q(t) is an extremal of the action integral S[q] = ∫ L(q, q̇) dt with fixed endpoints iff it satisfies the Euler–Lagrange equations in local coordinates; coordinate-free formulation uses the variational derivative dS = 0 leading to intrinsic equations. (Proof: Section 4, including existence/uniqueness under regularity assumptions.)